What If You Can’t Find a Free Version of Your Case?

Posted in Australia, Canada, CanLII, Case Law, LexisNexis, Search, U.K., U.S. | Tagged , ,

Sites like this one often extol the virtues of the many free case law sites on the Web.  But the reality is that the free case law sites are just like their paid peers and no site has a comprehensive collection of every opinion.  Whether they are omitted because of age, failure of the courts to make them available, or editorial decision, not all opinions make it into legal research databases.

What do you do if you can’t find it?  The first thing is to make sure you have simplified your research as much as possible.  If you are using a free site like CanLII or LexisNexis’s free case law, review your search query.  Law librarians can probably all remember a time when a lawyer asked for a case and the party name was incorrectly spelled, or it was in the wrong court.

Before you bail out on the free sites, confirm party names or use just one part of the name (“Dominion”) rather than the entire name (“Dominion Coffee Beans, LTD”).  Just because there is a corporate name doesn’t mean that it hasn’t been abbreviated in some way.  A quick search on CanLII for Dominion Bridge returned 21 cases.  But if you search for Dom’n you get 2 additional cases that do not appear in the original 21.

Some cases de-identify cases, so Smith v. Smith becomes S. v. S.  Your case may be there but just not using the term you are looking for.  The same thing goes for legislation.  Statutes and regulations may have popular names that do not actually appear in the language of the law, and so a search using those will fail.  For example, the USA PATRIOT Act is often called the Patriot Act in Canada, but USA is part of the acronym, not a country identifier.  Focus on the content of the law and see if you can find it by using specific keywords rather than popular names.

The same goes for specific key words in cases and legislation.  If you find that you are searching for a phrase and not getting results, try starting with a single word or two.  Then slowly expand your query to fine tune your results.  This is particularly true when you are using a legal term of art, like “time is of the essence”.  There are good chances that the phrase are used just as expected, but opinions are written by individuals and they may not always use the term in the same way.

One of my favorite examples is marijuana, also known as mary jane, or spelled as marihuana.  If you are looking for cases based on a word that might have multiple spellings, see if your search site allows for wildcards to replace part of the word.  For example, if you search on CanLII for mari*uana, with an asterisk replacing the j or h, you will retrieve cases with both spellings.

If you still can’t find the case, call a law librarian and see if they can help you.  Many Canadian provinces and U.S. states have law libraries that serve the local or provincial bars.  Academic law libraries take calls from alumni.  See if someone can confirm that the case isn’t available for free, and perhaps direct you to an alternative site with the case or provide the case to you directly.

Share

Related Posts:

Lexis Rebrands Free Case Law f/k/a LexisOne

Posted in Case Law, LexisNexis, U.S. | Tagged , ,

One of the better free U.S. case law sites has, for years, been LexisOne, a site powered by LexisNexis case law right down to the ability to search by document segment (counsel, court, etc.).  It didn’t match the paid subscription version of LexisNexis but it was an excellent starting point.  That site is now gone, and the resources have been shifted laterally into LexisNexis’ social community site.

The good news is you can still create an account (or use your old one) and search case law for free.  The benefits of using LexisOne continue in the new site.  The requirement to access it through the LexisNexis community portal is not at all surprising, if looked at it from LexisNexis’ perspective.  I’ve spent little time in there and this will likely make me use it more often.  There are elements that can be customized, mostly related to news and current awareness.  There are quick links to professional and practice area sub-sites, although some of them are outside the community portal and accessible without a log-in.

Hat tip to @catherinereach at the Chicago Bar Association.

Share

Related Posts:

2011 Clawbies Legal Research Blog Finalist

Posted in Content | Tagged

I’m honored that this blog was nominated for a 2011 Canadian Law Blog award (Clawbie) and was selected as a finalist in the Legal Research category.  Thank you for your support and hopefully 2012 will provide something valuable that you can use in your law practice or to meet your research needs.

Share

Related Posts:

OneNote Comes to the iPad

Posted in iPad, OneNote, Research Management | Tagged , , , ,

Mashable notes that Microsoft has extended its research, note taking tool, OneNote, to the iPad.  OneNote is one of the programs available as part of the Microsoft Office Suite as well as one of the benefits of using the free Microsoft Office Web apps.  PC users can drop content onto pages within a OneNote file, without having to conform to typical limitations of a word processor – like attaching it to a margin.  A OneNote file can have multiple tabs, enabling you to organize a variety of related information:  deposition summaries, for example, or documents relevant to a particular witness.  There is even a free Microsoft Office OneNote trial notebook template.

Lawyers appear to have embraced the iPad as the tablet of choice so far, and OneNote’s availability on that device will only enhance it’s usefulness in law practice.  If you are already considering using an iPad for trial, OneNote might be just the application to support your litigation preparation.

Share

Related Posts: