LexisNexis Canada Adds Quicklaw iPhone App

Posted in Apps, Canada, Case Law, iPhone, LexisNexis | Tagged

Update:  The following review was done using an iPod Touch 2G.  LexisNexis Canada has confirmed that it was designed for Apple 3G and 4G products, which explains some of the results outlined below.

Legal publishers continue to lag in getting mobile apps to their users.  Fastcase.com was first out the door over a year ago with an iPhone app which has garnered a lot of praise from users.  WestlawNext has an iPad app but otherwise the Thomson Reuters approach seems to be mobile Web sites, rather than apps, although their presentation of mobile offerings doesn’t appear to actually show all of their options.  Apparently, you can still rock it old school with Westlaw’s Palm OS clipping tool!  Blackberry and Android users are still relying on mobile Web sites.

This is the environment into which LexisNexis Canada releases its brand new iPhone app for its legal research service Quicklaw.  It follows the lead of the US LexisNexis app, which offers case name and citation look up. I was able to log in with my personalized LexisNexis profile as well as with a typical LexisNexis username and password.

As an app goes, it is pretty straight forward.  You can either select to search by a case name or search by a citation.  When you type in your search, it retrieves a document.  Wait, did I say A?  That was the odd thing.  I tried a couple of searches based on a single party name (try Strother, for example) and retrieved one document.  The case was formatted cleanly but I know that there are more results.  In fact, when I received an error message that the document I requested was too large and I should retry my search on Quicklaw, I did retry the search at the full Web site.  I retrieved 30+ hits using the same search-by-name form.

Once you have retrieved a document, you can share it (e-mail, etc.) or you can run it through LexisNexis’ citator, Quickcite.  The screen automatically rotates to landscape mode and the results are displayed in a clean version of the full Quickcite screen.

LexisNexis Canada Quicklaw iPhone App Quickcite Results

LexisNexis Canada Quicklaw iPhone App Quickcite Results

And that’s it.  It is a very basic app and, based on the single document retrieval, not a very useful one.  The citation search may be more useful if you are pulling up a case and you know the cite, but I don’t see any value in the case name search.

It also seems to have time out issues.  I was testing the app on an iPod Touch with a WiFi connection and expected it to come along pretty quickly.  But I had a half dozen error messages, most of which seemed to be time out errors rather than the reasons included in the error (document too big, etc.).  If I reran the search, I often was able to get the final result.

LexisNexis Canada Qucklaw iPhone App Error Message

LexisNexis Canada Qucklaw iPhone App Error Message

Share

Related Posts:

Automated Bluebook Citation for Lawyers

Posted in Add-on, Case Law, Firefox, Google Chrome, Law Journals, Legislation, LexisNexis, U.S., Westlaw | Tagged , ,

There are a number of citation tools available for online legal researchers but none of them are particularly good at handling the U.S. citation format known as “The Bluebook”, a fond name for the blue cover of The Uniform System of Citation.  Two Web browser extensions, one for Mozilla Firefox and one for Google Chrome, offer a step forward and it may be that support for the Bluebook will be more common for legal researchers. Continue reading

Share

Related Posts:

Regional Differences Between Free Legal Sites

Posted in Australia, Business Information, Canada, LexisNexis, U.S., Westlaw | Tagged ,

The 3 global legal publishers (Reed Elsevier LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters Westlaw, Wolters Kluwer) often have regional sites that provide legal information.  It is surprising, though, the differences in quality of content, layout, and information available.  I recently happened upon Findlaw Australia, a Thomson Reuter’s property.  You can find information about lawyers there, as well as some recent articles posted by, one assumes, the lawyers whose names are attached.  But if you click on one of the Learn About the Law topics on the home page, you end up with a list of very dated content (in the case of Conveyancing, articles written in 2001).  It’s surprising to find that sort of currency issue with content on a major publisher’s Web property.

Contrast it to Findlaw.com, the US version, which does a better job of segmenting the layman from the professional, and provides much more current content.  If I follow the link about Learn About the Law to real estate, buying a home, I find an article giving an overview by a lawyer, dated 2007, and indicating it comes from the well-known public law publisher, Nolo.  Whether you’re in law practice or just trying to learn about a different area of law, you need to be careful even on major publisher’s Web sites to ensure that freely accessible content is current and attributable.

LexisNexis Canada recently announced an updated look for its online lawyers directory at http://www.canadian-lawyers.ca.  Like the regional Findlaw sites, the LexisNexis Lawyers.com sites have legal information for the public as well as resources (including marketing tools) for lawyers.   The legal content on the site is specific to Canada, but the law directory content appears to be the same as you would find if you searched for a Canadian lawyer at LexisNexis’ main, U.S.-based directory site, Martindale.com.  In fact, if you search from the newly revamped site, the URL changes slightly to yet another LexisNexis Web property, http://canada.lawyers.com and the content is identical to that on Martindale.

These sites can be useful resources for either finding a lawyer or finding an article on a research topic, but it shows that, even with leading legal publishers, you need to be aware of the currency of the content on the sites.  It also highlights that you might want to look outside your geographic area to get a more powerful, deeper versions of finding tools that are regional.

Share

Related Posts:

The Mobile Legal Researcher: Apps and Sites

Posted in Android, BlackBerry, Canada, Case Law, iPhone, LexisNexis, Mobile, U.S., Web Browser, Westlaw | Tagged , , ,

Law firm library use is down, according to the latest American Bar Association Legal Technology survey.  It will be interesting to see if the increase in availability in mobile applications has any additional downward pressure on firm libraries.  There has been some initial development in legal research mobile apps but it’s clear that the legal publishers are still trying to figure out how to handle their mobile audience.

This uncertainty is perhaps clearest with the Westlaw mobile resources.  Or perhaps it’s not so much uncertainty but that they are trying to be careful to tailor their resources.  As this post says, Westlaw is trying to make its content available to all mobile devices, via the wireless.westlaw.com and next.westlaw.com sites.  While there is a lot of hype about Apple iPhone apps, Research in Motion’s Blackberry remains the handheld device of choice in law firms.  Using mobile Web sites instead of operating-system-limited apps is probably a smart move.  This may be especially sensible if the Google Android mobile operating system gains additional ground on smart phones and tablets.  Westlaw will be releasing an iPad app later this year so they have all of their bases covered.

Fastcase.com is the other legal publisher that has made great strides in mobile support.  In fact, their mobile apps are particularly inviting because they offer free access to the Fastcase.com case law service.  Their iPhone app is free to download and offers a “[f]ree, searchable library of American cases and statutes”.  How can you go wrong?    Unlike many of the other apps that are available, dictionaries and copies of rules, Fastcase’s app takes advantage of network connectivity to access their database of cases.  Like Westlaw, they are developing an iPad app that will be released soon.

LexisNexis has an iPhone app and some Blackberry support, BNA has a tax reference app, and CCH is providing e-mail updates combined with search on specific content with products like Employment Law Daily.  Other legal publishers seem to have avoided the mobile issue so far, and this may not be a positive position to be in.  Many of the current legal research Web sites do not render properly in handheld devices, because they have  been built either with a specific Web browser in mind (not one available on a handheld device) or with other technical requirements that some handheld browsers do not replicate in the same way.  Mobile apps sidestep that issue, but mobile Web sites are probably the best investment in the long term unless a publisher knows it has a large customer base on a particular device.

If you are contemplating how to do more legal research from your mobile device, your threshold question should be whether you need an iPhone to do the research you want to do.  That’s where the app development is currently happening.  The alternative is to make sure your handheld or tablet device can render the legal publisher Web sites.

Westlaw Canada Fails to Load

Westlaw Canada Fails to Load

LexisNexis Quicklaw Failure on Mobile Device

LexisNexis Quicklaw Failure on Mobile Device

Share

Related Posts: