Rethinking Your Desktop Search

Posted in Business Information, Document management, File Management, Google, Research Management, Search, Windows | Tagged , ,

Google has announced that it’s long running Desktop search tool will no longer be supported.  It was a great product for a number of reasons.  It improved over the operating system search and ran on Windows, Mac, and Linux machines.  You can download it until September 14th but current installations will not be supported after that date.

Why Desktop Search?

Why would you want desktop search, you might ask?  It provides the ability to search beyond the files on your computer, to make your searching experience more powerful.  As an example, a search with Google Desktop would return results both from your local machine and the Web, without you having to do searches in two places.  The Desktop tool was also extendable, so that it could look into files that the Windows operating system search couldn’t, improving your results.  It could also search network folders, so you didn’t have to clear that first obstacle of figuring out where you saved a file.

Still not convinced that desktop search is worth worrying about?  A LexisNexis 2008 workplace productivity survey of lawyers and non-lawyers found that nearly a third of lawyers spent between 1 and 2 hours a day looking for documents and e-mails.  Another 16% reported spending 2 to 4 hours a day.  That’s a significant amount of potential revenue, whether billable hour or lost time in an alternative fee arrangement, that can be improved by applying better search to information management.

Many lawyers have not yet migrated to Windows 7, and so are limited in their choices for alternatives.  Windows Desktop Search 4 is still available as a free download and is a huge improvement on the search within XP.  Windows 7 users have it built-in to their operating system.  Windows 7 users also have the benefit of additional search configurations, including forcing Windows 7 to index ALL the files on their desktops, and to add search connectors to enable you to search other sites from your search box.

One of the best known alternatives is Copernic, which has a commercial license for their Desktop Search Professional version.  There is a free version but it’s only for home users.  It is a more powerful tool than Google Desktop was, without some of the limitations on the size of file it could index.  It also has additional options for customizing which files are searched.  Copernic is a Windows-only product.

X1 is another well-known alternative to Google Desktop and has a range of fee-based products, for searching your business files or your Sharepoint server, among others.  Both Copernic and X1 have an e-discovery review focus, so if you are replacing Google Desktop, you may be able to get a replacement tool that can do dual duty.

Cloud Search

Another possibility is that your information is no longer stored on your desktop.  As lawyers and others move their files onto hosted Internet servers, the so-called cloud, they may not need to use desktop search any longer.  A great option is Greplin, which will search many of the most popular document and file storage sites, including Google Docs and Dropbox.com.  Here’s a quick video I made of how it works.  Another service similar to Greplin is Cloudmagic, although it searches fewer services.  I would expect to see more of these sorts of offerings appear in the future.

This is the latest in a progression of products to be sunsetted by Google.  Operating system search is improving and the Google ecosystem has been a bit sprawling, so this weeding certainly makes sense.  It’s been a good 7 years.

Share

Related Posts:

Organize and Share Your Search Results

Posted in Bookmarklet, Business Information, Content, Google, Research Management, Research Notebooks, Search | Tagged

Information Today highlighted a new search tool, called Searchteam.com. You can search at Searchteam’s site and save individual results into your account. Saved results can be sorted into tabbed folders, which can be useful if you are working on a specific legal research topic or focused on gathering competitive intelligence on a particular person or company.

Searchteam results include typical did you mean suggestions, but also flags matching subject areas, under subtopics as well as related categories. They will also highlight any folders that have been created for your Searchteam team, so that you do not duplicate previous efforts by someone else on the team.

And it is the team approach that could make this a powerful tool. Whether it is your law firm’s marketing staff or lawyers and staff in different offices, the focus is on asynchronous sharing. You can invite others to come and participate in the search, saving results to the same search folders or just accessing the results you have identified. By adopting a research notebook functionality, this works well both as an individual and group research tool. You can avoid sending repeated e-mails or maintaining document versions on topics that might be relatively fleeting in importance.

You can also add content to your Searchteam folders with their Web browser bookmarklet. This is helpful when you are not finding the relevant information in their search engine. As you move across the Web, you can select items to drop into your folders and which will then be accessible to your entire team, whether researchers or consumers of the research.

Share

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Realtime Search Diminished with Google’s Departure

Posted in Google, Search, Social media, Twitter | Tagged

Google has shuttered its Twitter-oriented search focused search, known as Google Realtime. The search was helpful because it retrieved more results than the default Twitter search, and included a timeline. You could quickly move through, and change, the results by focusing on a particular time. This was helpful for business intelligence (finding a Tweet sent out chronologically near to an event) as well as being a useful filter. Search Engine Land reports that Google’s contract with Twitter ended. You can still search Twitter messages by using Google Social Search but it’s not nearly as powerful and retrieves far more cluttered results. You can focus the search on Twitter (add site:twitter.com to your search) but it does not retrieve all possible matches. A search on Twitter.com itself also has some strange limitations. You can scroll through all of the posts of an individual to find a message. I was able to scroll back through my own messages today, but when I chose an early one (late 2009 was early for me), the search term wouldn’t retrieve the message. I suppose I will be returning to my other Twitter archive tools, like Visitmix’s Archivist, as a way to capture information for future use. Perhaps this is just a lull before we start to see some new, interesting ways of mining social information again.

Share

Related Posts:

Google Trims its Portfolio

Posted in Google, U.S. | Tagged , ,

We have seen Yahoo! ditching initiatives, either shutting them down or divesting them to other companies. Now Google is doing a thorough spring cleaning, eliminating a number of resources. You can read this ReadWriteWeb posting on it, but the most interesting ones that are going away are Google’s Sidewiki and specialized search pages like Uncle Sam. Sidewiki allowed you to mark up your search results for follow up. Yahoo! had a similar resource and also shut it down recently. The Uncle Sam search was not a resource I used heavily but it was like a custom search over U.S. .gov sites. I can’t say it is a loss since I didn’t rely on it but it is interesting to see Google dropping some of these narrow, selective research tools.

Share

Related Posts: