Making Your Information on Google a Priority

Posted in Content, Document management, E-mail Management, File Management, GMail | Tagged , , ,

Google Mail users will be familiar with the Priority Inbox.  This is an optional feature that attempts to automatically sort your incoming e-mail into groups:  Important and Unread, Starred, and Everything Else.  You can mark e-mails as important or not important, to help train your Priority Inbox.  You are not limited to just those three categories.  You can set up a priority view for other Google Mail labels – messages from the court, for example – so that they appear as a priority group of messages.

Now you can add the same sort of organization to your Google Docs account.  Check out this Lifehacker post for screenshots.  The revised Google Docs interface now has a right hand column where you can see a thumbnail of a document and, below, see in which collection it is contained.  Unlike a typical folder structure – but just like the labels in Google Mail – you can place a document into multiple collections.  Your list of collections appear on the left hand side of the screen, making it easy to navigate through your documents.  You can create sub-collections too, keeping that folder structure vibe alive!  Click on My Collections in the left hand column and mouse over the collection you want to add a sub-collection to, and you will see a menu called Actions appear at the right hand side of the screen.  Click on it and select New and then Collection.  Type in the name of your new collection and when you click OK, it will add your new collection.  You can now start to organize content into this new entity.

Share

Related Posts:

Search Your Personal Cloud with Greplin

Posted in Add-on, Document management, E-mail Management, Evernote, File Management, GMail, Screencast, Search | Tagged , ,

I ran across an old New York Times article mentioning Greplin, an interesting cloud search tool.  The site will index your information from online services you use, sites like  productivity tools like Google Docs and GMail and Evernote to social media and research tools like Facebook and Twitter to file storage sites like Dropbox.com and Box.net.  Lawyers who are moving their practice further into the cloud and off their local machine may need a replacement for the desktop or internal search tools they were using.  Greplin is a great option.  Here’s a 4 minute screencast on how it works:

The Greplin index remains on their servers so, like all cloud-based content, lawyers should consider whether the index – which contains the text of files stored the services Greplin searches for you – contains confidential information.  You should review their privacy policy and particularly the section on encryption.

I have had an account with Greplin for awhile and was converted to a free account when they rolled out a premium version.  I haven’t been a big fan because I search from my browser and rarely remembered to go to the Greplin site in order to search.

They have fixed that and rolled out a Google Chrome extension for the service.  Now that I can search from my browser without going anywhere, it is more likely to become an integral tool for me.

Share

Related Posts:

Getting Online Content into Usable Text

Posted in Content, Document management, File Management, Screencast | Tagged , , , ,

Most online legal information is text:  case law, statutes, blog posts, whatever.  But there are times that text isn’t really text, and that can make it hard to manage once you have found it.  Take a PDF, for example.  If it is made from a Microsoft Word document, chances are it has retained its text format, so that you can index and search it.  But if someone has created PDFs from a scanned image, even one that presents text when you read it, you might find retrieving it again difficult.  When a PDF contains pictures as representations of text, rather than text, you can’t keyword search it with Google Desktop, X1, or your other desktop search tools.

One way around this is to use an online OCR tool to run the scanned image through optical character recognition.  This will convert the text in the document into something that can be searched later.  Here’s an example.  A document from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was scanned into PDF, yielding a picture of a text file.  First, you download the file to your computer and then you go to a site like Free Online OCR, highlighted by MakeUseOf.  You identify the file you downloaded as the file to convert, select the output format (you can even put it BACK into PDF when finished) and click the convert button.

Here’s a quick screencast of how that works:

There are other free online OCR sites that you can retrieve with a quick Web search.  Some, like onlineocr.net use file limitations to throttle usage, so you may want to hunt around if you end up needing to OCR more than 15-20 documents per hour on a regular basis.  As I mention in the screencast, you will be uploading these files during the conversion process.  If you are not comfortable having the files hosted on a remote server and out of your control, you may want to look for OCR software to install.  But since much of what you find on the Internet during your research will be public knowledge, this shouldn’t impact your use of free OCR resources.

If you use Google Docs, there is built-in OCR.  Click on the Upload… button and you will be prompted to select files.  Select the option to convert text from PDF or image and select your files.  As Google uploads the files to your Google Docs accounts, it will perform OCR on the files.  It’s a great alternative to the other services, since your files end up in your file system as soon as the upload completes.

Share

Related Posts:

Rocking the Old School Research Extensions for IE

Posted in Add-on, Bing, File Management, Internet Explorer, Search, Windows | Tagged ,

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer continues to lag behind other Web browsers in providing tools for research.  I revisited two free IE add-ons from the first half of this decade that can provide some enhancements to your Internet Explorer-based research.  While they have some quirks and limitations that reflect their datedness, IE users may still find them worth trying.  They are the basic version of Copernic’s Agent and Cogitum’s Co-Citer.

Continue reading

Share

Related Posts: